Comments on: The M(onday) After: Iowa, or not so bad this time, actually

By: NC Fat Boy

NC Fat Boy — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:47:50 +0000

Maybe I misunderstand what “That positivity aside…”. Doesn't that convey a negatives? It's in a paragraph about the negatives…. Maybe it's just his grammar? LOL…

By: NC Fat Boy

NC Fat Boy — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:47:50 +0000

Maybe I misunderstand what “That positivity aside…”. Doesn't that convey a negatives? It's in a paragraph about the negatives…. Maybe it's just his grammar? LOL…

By: Alex

Alex — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:47:46 +0000

He called it serious progress, no?

By: NC Fat Boy

NC Fat Boy — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:26:07 +0000

"That positivity aside, the Hoosiers still did the same bad things they always do. They turned the ball over, though only 11 times, which is serious progress."

Really? Only 11 TOs is not a positive? UNC averages 15/game and 11 is a negative?

This team played a good game on Saturday, TOs, rebounds, defense. Yes, a couple of freshman mistakes may have cost them the game. That's to be expected this year.

But come on, 11 TOs is a negative?

I may start reading only the discussion.

By: cooper

cooper — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:22:24 +0000

Solid game, Williams was very good. I think its time to press the entire game, we have no depth shortage as 1-9 aren't that far apart in talent level and we struggle stopping teams in half court. The bad still being TO, rebounding, and watching Moore dribble as fast as he can to the baseline jump and throw the ball away. I thought VJ showed he can play and improve and I'd rather see Story or Dumes play point when VJ needs a rest. Its become pretty obvious why Moore received only one D1 scholarship offer